observations:
simple
egg in frying pan
oil in pan
deep voice speaking in background
short
any questions?
inferences:
the oil symbolizes drugs while the egg is your brain
this shows that by doing drugs your brain will be fried
it is simple and to the point
reaches a broad spectrum of people
doesn't focus on one drug, but all
video number 2
observations:
Rachael Leigh Cook stars in it
focuses on heroine
she breaks things
is more specific on what things will happen if you do heroine
smashes the egg
inferences:
this ad is more focused on heroine
the young actor speaks to the youth
the violence almost scares you into not doing heroine
longer so perhaps the viewers believe it more
analysis:
The intended audience for video number one is anyone who has ever considered doing or who has ever done drugs. It reaches a broad audience because it is a very simple and to the point commercial. Video number two has a more specific audience. This audience is perhaps young people who do or have thought about doing heroine only. The tone in the first video is more subtle. The speaker's voice is calm and is not threatening. The tone in the second video is much more intense. This ad is violent and scary, as the actress lists the things that will happen to you if you do heroine. You do not need to know anything in specific to understand the first video. The second however, stars actress Rachael Leigh Cook. Knowing that this is a famous actress may change the video's ethos. By seeing that a famous actress is speaking about heroine, the audience may want to listen more. The purposes in these videos are the same: to keep people off of drugs, however it is more specific to heroine in the second video. The second video is more effective rhetorically because it uses more pathos. The actress is upset which makes you think maybe she has been through the pain of doing drugs before and the audience sympathizes for her. She also has more ethos because she is a famous actress.

1 comment:
Nice work here, Amanda! I think that you've got an eye for this rhetorical analysis thing. Mr. Sisk
Post a Comment